[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121219171423.GW4985@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:14:23 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, w.sang@...gutronix.de,
khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, sjg@...omium.org,
grundler@...omium.org, naveen@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-core: Add gpio based bus arbitration
implementation
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:32:01PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> I'm not convinced on the design of this protocol. It won't scale beyond
> 2 bus masters and it seems very specific to the design of a specific
> piece of hardware. I don't think it is mature enough to bake into the
I ought to point out that the original patch would've baked this into
the Samsung I2C driver but I asked for it to be split out as it's
nothing to do with the controller really and I'm sure I've seen it
before.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists