[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WoGfuqCoVnDh-hPA-OL-7xp1eLN6RBHT_XePFDs5V24A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:02:56 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Avoid divide by 0 when max_discard_sectors is 0
David,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:42 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> The recent commit "block: discard granularity might not be power of 2"
>> introduced a divide by 0 in the kernel. Previously the code didn't
>> try to divide by discard_granularity when max_discard_sectors was 0.
>>
>> Fix the code to only do the division if max_discard_sectors is
>> specified.
>>
>
> Could you try Linus' patch at
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135584941732572 and give your Tested-by
> if it solves your issue?
Hoo boy. Thanks for the pointer. I missed that when searching to see
if this had already been fixed. :(
I'm pretty sure Linus's patch will fix my problem since I think my
system has "max_discard_sectors" as 0 and his patch has the same
effect as mine: avoid the divide by 0. Someone else will need to test
his patch on a system that actually uses discard. In any case, I will
test and send a Tested-by as soon as I'm able.
Please consider my patch abandoned.
>
> Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists