[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D22766.9090107@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:45:26 +0100
From: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
CC: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...hat.com,
JBottomley@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [v3.7 Regression] [SCSI] sd: Implement support for WRITE SAME
On 12/19/2012 08:58 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19 2012 at 11:58am -0500,
> Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com> writes:
>>
>> Joseph> I captured the netconsole output from boot until I reproduced
>> Joseph> the bug. The RIP points to kcryptd_crypt_write_io_submit() in
>> Joseph> ~/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c. The output can be seen at:
>>
>> I'm thinking that dm-crypt should probably set max_write_same_sectors to
>> 0. It doesn't really make much sense for a crypto driver to pass that
>> command through.
IMHO WRITE_SAME doesn't not make sense in encrypted storage. The same sectors
in plaintext are _not_ the same in ciphertext. NEVER.
(If so, you have a security problem.)
It must be disabled in dmcrypt explicitly then (max_write_same_sectors?).
Is it only dmcrypt, or encrypted fs are affected too?
Milan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists