[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121219204852.GH24895@liondog.tnic>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:48:53 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/27] x86, mm: make pgd next calculation consistent
with pud/pmd
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:37:14PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> update to :
>
> ---
> Subject: [PATCH] x86, mm: make pgd next calculation consistent with pud/pmd
>
> Just like the way we calculate next for pud and pmd, aka
> round down and add size.
>
> also remove not needed next checking, just pass end with phys_pud_init.
>
> pyhs_pud_init() uses PTRS_PER_PUD to stop its loop early so it could handle
> big end properly.
Almost there, let's merge the last two sentences:
"Also, do not boundary-check 'next' but pass 'end' down to
phys_pud_init() instead because the loop in there terminates at
PTRS_PER_PUD and thus can handle a possibly bigger 'end' properly."
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists