[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121219221741.1E1CA3E0AD6@localhost>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:17:41 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] gpio: twl4030: Cache the direction and output states in private data
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:53:23 +0100, Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:52:06 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi
> ><peter.ujfalusi@...com> wrote:
> >> Use more coherent locking in the driver. Use bitfield to store the
> >GPIO
> >> direction and if the pin is configured as output store the status
> >also in a
> >> bitfiled.
> >> In this way we can just look at these bitfields when we need
> >information
> >> about the pin status and only reach out to the chip when it is
> >needed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> >
> >Applied, thanks
> >
> >g.
> >
> >> @@ -279,64 +276,98 @@ static void twl_free(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> >unsigned offset)
> >> {
> >> struct gpio_twl4030_priv *priv = to_gpio_twl4030(chip);
> >>
> >> + mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
> >> if (offset >= TWL4030_GPIO_MAX) {
> >> twl4030_led_set_value(offset - TWL4030_GPIO_MAX, 1);
>
> I have the mobile but where is the unlock here?
Good catch. I've dropped the patch. Peter, please resend a fixed-up version.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists