lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:22:55 +0000
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kgene.kim@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: remove exynos_gpio_cfg

On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:44:01 +0900, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com> wrote:
> The exynos_gpio_cfg can be substituted to samsung_gpio_cfgs[8].
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>

Hi Joonyoung,

I need some help here. I don't understand what this patch is for or how
it works. The commit text above doesn't give me enough information to
evaluate the patch. What is the intent here? Why is samsung_gpio_cfgs[8]
more correct than exynos_gpio_cfg?

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists