linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: remove exynos_gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121219222255.49E263E0AD6@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:22:55 +0000
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kgene.kim@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: remove exynos_gpio_cfg

On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:44:01 +0900, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com> wrote:
> The exynos_gpio_cfg can be substituted to samsung_gpio_cfgs[8].
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>

Hi Joonyoung,

I need some help here. I don't understand what this patch is for or how
it works. The commit text above doesn't give me enough information to
evaluate the patch. What is the intent here? Why is samsung_gpio_cfgs[8]
more correct than exynos_gpio_cfg?

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/