linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 01/27] x86, mm: Fix page table early allocation offset checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVt9kwrwZysLe_KkEXHF-scRVA1-0UJqqu0NMs1h=jZMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:30:06 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/27] x86, mm: Fix page table early allocation offset checking

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:01:55PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> During debug load kernel above 4G, found one page if is not used in BRK
>> and it should be with early page allocation.
>
> What does that mean?
>
> I see that this patch adds a change to not use the page at pgt_buf_top
> anymore but why? Is pgt_buf_top the first invalid address we cannot
> reserve anymore?
>
> Generally, can we get this whole deal described in a bit more detail for
> the mere mortals among us, maybe a short ascii art thing showing what
> all those pgt_buf_{start,end,top} mean.
>

change that too:
---
Subject: [PATCH] x86, mm: Fix page table early allocation offset checking

During debug load kernel above 4G, found one page if is not used in BRK
and it should be with early page allocation.

pgt_buf_top is address that can not be used, so should check if then new
end is above than that top, otherwise last page will not used.

Fix that checking and also add print out for every allocation from BRK
---

>>  arch/x86/mm/init.c |    4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> index 6f85de8..c4293cf 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ __ref void *alloc_low_pages(unsigned int num)
>>                                               __GFP_ZERO, order);
>>       }
>>
>> -     if ((pgt_buf_end + num) >= pgt_buf_top) {
>> +     if ((pgt_buf_end + num) > pgt_buf_top) {
>>               unsigned long ret;
>>               if (min_pfn_mapped >= max_pfn_mapped)
>>                       panic("alloc_low_page: ran out of memory");
>> @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ __ref void *alloc_low_pages(unsigned int num)
>>       } else {
>>               pfn = pgt_buf_end;
>>               pgt_buf_end += num;
>> +             printk(KERN_DEBUG "BRK [%#010lx, %#010lx] PGTABLE\n",
>
>                 pr_debug
>

I really hate pr_debug.

pr_debug is useless. it will not print out anything.

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/