[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D2C78B.4060109@synopsys.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:38:43 +0530
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch v1 45/55] ARC: unaligned access emulation
On Monday 12 November 2012 07:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 12 November 2012, Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com wrote:
>> +
>> +config ARC_MISALIGN_ACCESS
>> + bool "Emulate unaligned memory access (userspace only)"
>> + default N
>> + help
>> + This enables misaligned 16 & 32 bit memory access from user space.
>> + Use ONLY-IF-ABS-NECESSARY as it will be very slow and also can hide
>> + potential bugs in code
>
> parisc and ia64 both have the same feature, and they use sysctl to configure
> it at run-time. Maybe you should pick one of the two sysctl implementations
> and hook that up to your implementation as well.
Spoke too soon ! The only caveat to removing the Kconfig option is that
it will pull-in unaligned emulation code as well as the dependent
in-kernel disassembler unconditionally into the build.
Are you OK if we keep this support build time - provided that once it is
build time enabled - we have the additional runtime sysctl based
toggle-ability as you suggested.
Only one of our customers need this feature and this gives people
reasons to moan about the kernel .text size and such.
Thanks,
Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists