lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:38:18 +0530
From:	Jassi Brar <>
To:	Stephen Boyd <>
	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <>,
	Venki Pallipadi <>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/16] sched: per-entity load-tracking

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Stephen Boyd <> wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 5:08 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> The patchset introduces 64-bit atomic ops, which would need
>> init_atomic64_lock() already called, but that is an initcall made too
>> late. Should we consider calling init_atomic64_lock() sooner in
>> start_kernel()?
>> As an example of breakage, I see the following dump with
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK on an OMAP based Pandaboard.
> I saw this post while searching lkml for similar problems. Perhaps you
> can try applying my patch to see if this BUG message goes away. Thanks.
Yes, this should do too.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists