lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:56:17 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <>
To:	"Dongxiao Xu" <>
Cc:	"" <>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/swiotlb: Exchange to contiguous
 memory for map_sg hook

>>> On 20.12.12 at 02:23, "Xu, Dongxiao" <> wrote:
> Sorry, maybe I am still not describing this issue clearly.

No, at least I understood you the way you re-describe below.

> Take the libata case as an example, the static DMA buffer locates 
> (dev->link->ap->sector_buf , here we use Data Structure B in the graph) in 
> the following structure:
> -------------------------------------Page boundary
> <Data Structure A>
> <Data Structure B>
> -------------------------------------Page boundary
> <Data Structure B (cross page)>
> <Data Structure C>
> -------------------------------------Page boundary
> Where Structure B is our DMA target.
> For Data Structure B, we didn't care about the simultaneous access, either 
> lock or sync function will take care of it.
> What we are not sure is "read/write of A and C from other processor". As we 
> will have memory copy for the pages, and at the same time, other CPU may 
> access A/C.

The question is whether what libata does here is valid in the first
place - fill an SG list entry with something that crosses a page
boundary and is not a compound page.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists