[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121220112202.3ead1fe1@endymion.delvare>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:22:02 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
Juergen Beisert <jbe@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] linux/kernel.h: Fix DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST with unsigned
divisors
Hi Guenter,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:41:22 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 01:47:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The changelog didn't describe the end-user visible effects of the bug.
> > Please always include this information. Because...
>
> One observed effect is that the s2c_hwmon driver reports a value of 4198403
> instead of 0 if the ADC reads 0.
>
> Other impact is unpredictable. Problem is seen if the divisor is an unsigned
> variable or constant and the dividend is less than (divisor/2).
Really? In my own testing, the problem only shows with dividend == 0,
and even then, only when dividend is signed and divisor is not.
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(5, 20U) returns 0 as expected, and so do
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(0 / 20), DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(0U / 20) and
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(0U / 20U).
Are your observations different?
> > The patch is applicable to 3.7.x. Should we backport it?
>
> Yes. DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST is used throughout the kernel, and impact is
> unpredictable.
>
> 3.6 needs it as well.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists