[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UeAN103KVLb_z-oF8AXu7m00uZs6jw_BOHTz9RExK4SA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:53:53 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@...il.com>
Cc: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>, jg1.han@...sung.com,
yulgon.kim@...sung.com, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Praveen Paneri <p.paneri@...sung.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
balbi@...com, kishon@...com, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Update & move usb-phy types to
generic include layer
Vivek,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>> Vivek,
>>
>> Since you're changing the name, I would have expected to see a removal
>> of the old enum type in this patch. I don't see it. After applying
>> all of your patches I find that S5P_USB_PHY_HOST and
>> S5P_USB_PHY_DEVICE are still defined and used.
>>
>
> True that we should have removed the earlier defined enums, infact i
> did the same
> in patchset v4 for this series. But since in this patchset i separated
> out drivers and
> architecture part, i thought it would be easier to remove them in one
> shot in a latter commit
> which will actually touch upon all architecture related code
> (mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c,
> mach-s5pv210/setup-usb-phy.c, and include/plat/usb-phy.h) once this
> approach is accepted.
>
>> $ git grep S5P_USB_PHY_HOST
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c: else if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_HOST)
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c: else if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_HOST)
>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/usb-phy.h: S5P_USB_PHY_HOST,
>>
>> I believe that those usages of the old enum should also be switched
>> over and the old enum removed.
>>
> Sure, those enums need to be removed.
> If you say i will submit a patch for the same.
It would be nice to add it to the patch series in the next version. Thanks!
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists