[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1356026521.5896.55.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:02:01 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <cbe@...dl.org>,
Clark Williams <clark@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH RT] rtmutex: Use raw_spin_trylock() in
rt_mutex_slowlock() to ease possible live locks
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 20:31 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Talking with Thomas, the proper solution is:
> Then we have this lovely code:
>
> block/blk-ioc.c: put_io_context_active()
>
> retry:
> spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&ioc->lock, flags, 1);
> hlist_for_each_entry(icq, n, &ioc->icq_list, ioc_node) {
> if (icq->flags & ICQ_EXITED)
> continue;
> if (spin_trylock(icq->q->queue_lock)) {
> ioc_exit_icq(icq);
> spin_unlock(icq->q->queue_lock);
> } else {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->lock, flags);
> cpu_relax();
s/cpu_relax/cpu_chill/
-- Steve
> goto retry;
> }
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists