linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] drivers: mailbox: framework creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121220182835.GB21056@atomide.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:28:36 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy-ext@...ricsson.com>, arm@...nel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl>,
	Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@...itl.com>,
	Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Dom Cobley <popcornmix@...il.com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
	Juan Gutierrez <jgutierrez@...com>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...ia.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux <STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com>,
	Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] drivers: mailbox: framework creation

* Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> [121220 10:19]:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Loic Pallardy
> <loic.pallardy-ext@...ricsson.com> wrote:
> 
> > OMAP and ST-Ericsson platforms are both using mailbox to communicate
> > with some coprocessors.
> > Based on OMAP existing mailbox framework, this series proposes a
> > generic framework, living under drivers/mailbox.
> 
> I like this patch series so you have my Acked-by.
> 
> Since it's a new subsystem and affects a few ARM architectures can
> we merge this into the ARM SoC tree once we have consensus,
> so we get some rotation in linux-next that way?

Yes good idea.
 
> Olof/Arnd?

I suggest we set up an immutable branch against
v3.8-rc1 when it's out with only these patches in it.
Then we can all merge it in as needed. Maybe Arnd or
Olof can set up the branch?

FYI, looks like I need to merge in this branch too to
avoid build errors with remoteproc enabled once I flip
on the multiplatform support for omap2+.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/