lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:13:15 -0700
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Jan Glauber <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Update 2][PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in advance

[+cc linux-pci, Myron]

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to
> acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate
> "firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently
> the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward
> (to put it lightly).
>
> This is how it works, roughly:
>
>   1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge,
>      creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that
>      object to acpi_pci_root_add().
>
>   2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object,
>      populates its "device" field with its argument's address
>      (device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1).
>
>   3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed
>      to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are
>      passed to pci_create_root_bus().
>
>   4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object
>      and passes its "dev" member to device_register().
>
>   5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to
>      acpi_platform_notify(), is called.
>
> So far, so good.  Now it starts to be "interesting".
>
>   6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of
>      the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes
>      acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the
>      given device object.
>
>   7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given
>      device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI
>      root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle().
>
>   8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI
>      root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment
>      and bus numbers.  Its handle is then used to initialize the
>      ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by
>      acpi_bind_one().  However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we
>      started with in step 1.
>
> Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided
> thanks to commit f3fd0c8 (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be
> initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the
> ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register().

This was a mess.  Thanks for cleaning it up.

> Accordingly, make pci_acpi_scan_root() pass the root bridge's ACPI
> handle to pci_create_root_bus() and make the latter set the ACPI
> handle in its struct pci_host_bridge object's "dev" member before
> passing it to device_register(), so that steps 6-8 above aren't
> necessary any more.
>
> To implement that, I decided to repurpose the 4th argument of
> pci_create_root_bus(), because that allowed me to avoid defining
> additional callbacks or similar things and didn't seem to impact
> architectures without ACPI substantially.
>
> All architectures using pci_create_root_bus() directly are updated
> as needed, but only x86 and ia64 are affected as far as the behavior
> is concerned (no one else uses ACPI).  There should be no changes in
> behavior resulting from this on the other architectures.

I'd like to converge all architectures on a single higher-level
interface, pci_scan_root_bus(), then deprecate and remove
pci_create_root_bus(), pci_scan_bus_parented(), and pci_scan_bus().
You're changing the underlying pci_create_root_bus(), but not the
higher-level interfaces that use it, which will make converging a bit
harder.

Here's an alternate implementation strategy; see what you think:

- Add "struct acpi_dev_node acpi_node" to struct pci_sysdata (x86) and
struct pci_controller (ia64).  These are the only two arches that use
ACPI.

- Add an empty generic (weak) pcibios_create_root_ bus().

- Add pcibios_create_root_bus() for x86 and ia64 that does the
ACPI_HANDLE_SET().

It does add a pcibios callback, which you were trying to avoid, but it
does have the advantages that all the higher-level interfaces that use
pci_create_root_bus() will keep working and only the ACPI arches have
the acpi_dev_node member and associated code.

> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> ---
>
> Peter Anvin pointed out to me that it's better to make it clear in the
> changelog what the patch actually does versus what might be left as future
> work, so here's another update with a slightly modified (and hopefully better)
> changelog.  The patch itself hasn't been changed.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> ---
>  arch/ia64/pci/pci.c              |    5 ++++-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c |    3 ++-
>  arch/s390/pci/pci.c              |    3 ++-
>  arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c          |    3 ++-
>  arch/x86/pci/acpi.c              |    5 ++++-
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c          |   18 ------------------
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c           |   19 -------------------
>  drivers/pci/probe.c              |   17 ++++++++++++-----
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h          |    1 -
>  include/linux/pci.h              |    9 ++++++++-
>  10 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ linux-pm/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -483,6 +483,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan
>         LIST_HEAD(resources);
>         struct pci_bus *bus = NULL;
>         struct pci_sysdata *sd;
> +       struct pci_root_sys_info si;
>         int node;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
>         int pxm;
> @@ -522,6 +523,8 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan
>         sd = &info->sd;
>         sd->domain = domain;
>         sd->node = node;
> +       si.acpi_node.handle = device->handle;
> +       si.sysdata = sd;
>         /*
>          * Maybe the desired pci bus has been already scanned. In such case
>          * it is unnecessary to scan the pci bus with the given domain,busnum.
> @@ -553,7 +556,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan
>                 if (!setup_mcfg_map(info, domain, (u8)root->secondary.start,
>                                     (u8)root->secondary.end, root->mcfg_addr))
>                         bus = pci_create_root_bus(NULL, busnum, &pci_root_ops,
> -                                                 sd, &resources);
> +                                                 &si, &resources);
>
>                 if (bus) {
>                         pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/probe.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1634,7 +1634,9 @@ unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus(struct p
>  }
>
>  struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> -               struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources)
> +                                   struct pci_ops *ops,
> +                                   struct pci_root_sys_info *sys_info,
> +                                   struct list_head *resources)
>  {
>         int error;
>         struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> @@ -1650,7 +1652,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(stru
>         if (!b)
>                 return NULL;
>
> -       b->sysdata = sysdata;
> +       b->sysdata = sys_info ? sys_info->sysdata : NULL;
>         b->ops = ops;
>         b2 = pci_find_bus(pci_domain_nr(b), bus);
>         if (b2) {
> @@ -1666,6 +1668,8 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(stru
>         bridge->dev.parent = parent;
>         bridge->dev.release = pci_release_bus_bridge_dev;
>         dev_set_name(&bridge->dev, "pci%04x:%02x", pci_domain_nr(b), bus);
> +       ACPI_HANDLE_SET(&bridge->dev,
> +                       sys_info ? sys_info->acpi_node.handle : NULL);
>         error = device_register(&bridge->dev);
>         if (error)
>                 goto bridge_dev_reg_err;
> @@ -1798,6 +1802,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_root_bus(struct
>                 struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources)
>  {
>         struct pci_host_bridge_window *window;
> +       struct pci_root_sys_info si = { .sysdata = sysdata, };
>         bool found = false;
>         struct pci_bus *b;
>         int max;
> @@ -1808,7 +1813,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_root_bus(struct
>                         break;
>                 }
>
> -       b = pci_create_root_bus(parent, bus, ops, sysdata, resources);
> +       b = pci_create_root_bus(parent, bus, ops, &si, resources);
>         if (!b)
>                 return NULL;
>
> @@ -1833,13 +1838,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_scan_root_bus);
>  struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus_parented(struct device *parent,
>                 int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata)
>  {
> +       struct pci_root_sys_info si = { .sysdata = sysdata, };
>         LIST_HEAD(resources);
>         struct pci_bus *b;
>
>         pci_add_resource(&resources, &ioport_resource);
>         pci_add_resource(&resources, &iomem_resource);
>         pci_add_resource(&resources, &busn_resource);
> -       b = pci_create_root_bus(parent, bus, ops, sysdata, &resources);
> +       b = pci_create_root_bus(parent, bus, ops, &si, &resources);
>         if (b)
>                 pci_scan_child_bus(b);
>         else
> @@ -1851,13 +1857,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_scan_bus_parented);
>  struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops,
>                                         void *sysdata)
>  {
> +       struct pci_root_sys_info si = { .sysdata = sysdata, };
>         LIST_HEAD(resources);
>         struct pci_bus *b;
>
>         pci_add_resource(&resources, &ioport_resource);
>         pci_add_resource(&resources, &iomem_resource);
>         pci_add_resource(&resources, &busn_resource);
> -       b = pci_create_root_bus(NULL, bus, ops, sysdata, &resources);
> +       b = pci_create_root_bus(NULL, bus, ops, &si, &resources);
>         if (b) {
>                 pci_scan_child_bus(b);
>                 pci_bus_add_devices(b);
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/pci.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -700,8 +700,15 @@ void pci_bus_add_devices(const struct pc
>  struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus_parented(struct device *parent, int bus,
>                                       struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata);
>  struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata);
> +
> +struct pci_root_sys_info {
> +       void *sysdata;
> +       struct acpi_dev_node acpi_node;
> +};
> +
>  struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> -                                   struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
> +                                   struct pci_ops *ops,
> +                                   struct pci_root_sys_info *sys_info,
>                                     struct list_head *resources);
>  int pci_bus_insert_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b, int bus, int busmax);
>  int pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(struct pci_bus *b, int busmax);
> Index: linux-pm/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
> +++ linux-pm/arch/ia64/pci/pci.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root
>         struct pci_controller *controller;
>         unsigned int windows = 0;
>         struct pci_root_info info;
> +       struct pci_root_sys_info si;
>         struct pci_bus *pbus;
>         char *name;
>         int pxm;
> @@ -378,7 +379,9 @@ pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root
>          * should handle the case here, but it appears that IA64 hasn't
>          * such quirk. So we just ignore the case now.
>          */
> -       pbus = pci_create_root_bus(NULL, bus, &pci_root_ops, controller,
> +       si.sysdata = controller;
> +       si.acpi_node.handle = controller->acpi_handle;
> +       pbus = pci_create_root_bus(NULL, bus, &pci_root_ops, &si,
>                                    &info.resources);
>         if (!pbus) {
>                 pci_free_resource_list(&info.resources);
> Index: linux-pm/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> +++ linux-pm/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> @@ -1644,6 +1644,7 @@ void __devinit pcibios_scan_phb(struct p
>         LIST_HEAD(resources);
>         struct pci_bus *bus;
>         struct device_node *node = hose->dn;
> +       struct pci_root_sys_info si = { .sysdata = hose, };
>         int mode;
>
>         pr_debug("PCI: Scanning PHB %s\n", of_node_full_name(node));
> @@ -1661,7 +1662,7 @@ void __devinit pcibios_scan_phb(struct p
>
>         /* Create an empty bus for the toplevel */
>         bus = pci_create_root_bus(hose->parent, hose->first_busno,
> -                                 hose->ops, hose, &resources);
> +                                 hose->ops, &si, &resources);
>         if (bus == NULL) {
>                 pr_err("Failed to create bus for PCI domain %04x\n",
>                         hose->global_number);
> Index: linux-pm/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> +++ linux-pm/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -590,6 +590,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_one_
>  {
>         LIST_HEAD(resources);
>         struct device_node *node = pbm->op->dev.of_node;
> +       struct pci_root_sys_info si = { .sysdata = pbm, };
>         struct pci_bus *bus;
>
>         printk("PCI: Scanning PBM %s\n", node->full_name);
> @@ -603,7 +604,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_one_
>         pbm->busn.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
>         pci_add_resource(&resources, &pbm->busn);
>         bus = pci_create_root_bus(parent, pbm->pci_first_busno, pbm->pci_ops,
> -                                 pbm, &resources);
> +                                 &si, &resources);
>         if (!bus) {
>                 printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create bus for %s\n",
>                        node->full_name);
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -303,28 +303,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_find_device(struct d
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static int acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle)
> -{
> -       int num;
> -       unsigned int seg, bus;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * The string should be the same as root bridge's name
> -        * Please look at 'pci_scan_bus_parented'
> -        */
> -       num = sscanf(dev_name(dev), "pci%04x:%02x", &seg, &bus);
> -       if (num != 2)
> -               return -ENODEV;
> -       *handle = acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle(seg, bus);
> -       if (!*handle)
> -               return -ENODEV;
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = {
>         .bus = &pci_bus_type,
>         .find_device = acpi_pci_find_device,
> -       .find_bridge = acpi_pci_find_root_bridge,
>  };
>
>  static int __init acpi_pci_init(void)
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -107,24 +107,6 @@ void acpi_pci_unregister_driver(struct a
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_unregister_driver);
>
> -acpi_handle acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus)
> -{
> -       struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> -       acpi_handle handle = NULL;
> -
> -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -       list_for_each_entry(root, &acpi_pci_roots, node)
> -               if ((root->segment == (u16) seg) &&
> -                   (root->secondary.start == (u16) bus)) {
> -                       handle = root->device->handle;
> -                       break;
> -               }
> -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -       return handle;
> -}
> -
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle);
> -
>  /**
>   * acpi_is_root_bridge - determine whether an ACPI CA node is a PCI root bridge
>   * @handle - the ACPI CA node in question.
> Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -443,7 +443,6 @@ struct acpi_pci_root {
>  /* helper */
>  acpi_handle acpi_get_child(acpi_handle, u64);
>  int acpi_is_root_bridge(acpi_handle);
> -acpi_handle acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle(unsigned int, unsigned int);
>  struct acpi_pci_root *acpi_pci_find_root(acpi_handle handle);
>  #define DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(dev) ((acpi_handle)ACPI_HANDLE(dev))
>
> Index: linux-pm/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> +++ linux-pm/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> @@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ static void zpci_free_iomap(struct zpci_
>
>  static int zpci_create_device_bus(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
>  {
> +       struct pci_root_sys_info si = { .sysdata = zdev, };
>         struct resource *res;
>         LIST_HEAD(resources);
>         int i;
> @@ -888,7 +889,7 @@ static int zpci_create_device_bus(struct
>         }
>
>         zdev->bus = pci_create_root_bus(NULL, ZPCI_BUS_NR, &pci_root_ops,
> -                                       zdev, &resources);
> +                                       &si, &resources);
>         if (!zdev->bus)
>                 return -EIO;
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists