[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1356087972.4547.26.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:06:12 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.6.6-rt17
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 22:28 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Dear RT Folks,
>
> I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
> not announced update release to 3.6.6.
>
> Changes since 3.6.6-rt16:
>
> * Finally make the NOHZ softirq pending detection work with the new
> softirq scheme.
Well, almost. They gripe when rebooting, but I haven't seen one other
than that. This is 3.6.11-rt23 on a 64 core DL980 I set up to run some
latency tests on.
[ 318.692463] kvm: exiting hardware virtualization
[ 319.568482] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
[ 319.647819] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 80
[ 319.876148] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
[ 319.876172] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
[ 319.988912] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 282
[ 320.097066] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
[ 320.321428] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 80
[ 320.662601] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
[ 320.662637] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
[ 323.162636] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
[ 323.162649] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 202
[ 325.217675] Restarting system.
Don't suppose you know why LAZY_PREEMPT would make 3.0-rt explode if you
turn on wakeup_rt tracer do you?
I backported that and your softirq changes to 3.0. New softirq handling
scheme work spiffy there, LAZY_PREEMPT works fine too.. until you turn
tracing on, then it corrupts memory, and makes mushroom cloud.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists