linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Move cpu rq properties from "struct rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1356100999.5896.98.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:43:19 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Move cpu rq properties from "struct rt_rq" to
 "struct rq"

On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 07:51 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> Now if you want to encapsulate the rt sched group, then you could add a
> new struct and put that into the rt_rq struct and use that for all the
> group functions. But please don't just cludder the rq struct with rt

cludder? I must have a studder, as it is suppose to be clutter and
stutter!

;-)

-- Steve

> specific data. The rt_rq was created as a container for the rt class.
> 
> -- Steve
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/