linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf annotate: Add --gtk option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121221154457.GE15204@liondog.tnic>
Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:44:57 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf annotate: Add --gtk option

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 06:16:46PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Current setup_browser() code checks the stdin to be a tty and if
> not it assumes piping to other commands so set the use_browser to 0
> (stdio) and disables GTK output.
>
> Maybe we can change this behavior for --gtk case.

Change it in the sense that for the --gtk case stdin doesn't have to
be a tty? So that with --gtk you can still pipe perf output to other
commands?

I can't imagine a sensible --gtk use case with output piped to other
commands. Hmm.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/