linux-kernel - Re: CONFIG_GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK with asm-generic/syscalls.h (was Re: [git pull] signal.git pile 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121221160713.GT4939@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:07:14 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Cc:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK with asm-generic/syscalls.h (was Re:
 [git pull] signal.git pile 2)

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:52:01AM +0000, James Hogan wrote:

> Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
> 
> I also see this issue with metag when I try and select
> CONFIG_GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK. Until asm-generic/syscalls.h goes away it
> seems a shame to have to keep a misleading #define sys_sigaltstack
> sys_sigaltstack bodge in architecture's asm/syscalls.h.

OK, I'm convinced; Vineet, could you reply with Signed-off-by: to use?
It's trivial, of course, but...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/