linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 05/46] x86, mm: Revert back good

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50D49290.2030403@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:47:12 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
CC:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/46] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit

On 12/21/2012 12:22 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, Yinghai and HPA
>
> What's the staus of this patch,  will it go for 3.8? Is there anything
> blocking this patch?
>

It's 3.9 material at this point.  The sheer size and messiness of the 
whole set has been the holdup.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/