[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121221215505.6dab13ca@bob.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 21:55:05 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Fix unreasonable write toward closed pty.
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:59:19 +0400
Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru> wrote:
> We should not write toward the closed pty.
> Now it happens, if one side close last file descriptor,
> and other side in this moment write to it.
> It also prevents scheduling unnecessary work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>
> ---
> drivers/tty/pty.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/pty.c b/drivers/tty/pty.c
> index a82b399..1ce1362 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/pty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/pty.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ static int pty_space(struct tty_struct *to)
>
> static int pty_write(struct tty_struct *tty, const unsigned char
> *buf, int c) {
> + if (test_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, &tty->flags))
> + return -EIO;
> struct tty_struct *to = tty->link;
This
a) doesn't do anything in many cases because there is no lock to make
the test_bit meaningful
b) produces an obvious compiler warning
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists