[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1356130308.21834.8014.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:51:48 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>
To: Stefan Hasko <hasko.stevo@...il.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vimalkumar <j.vimal@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: integer overflow fix
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 21:39 +0100, Stefan Hasko wrote:
> Fixed integer overflow in function htb_dequeue
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hasko <hasko.stevo@...il.com>
> ---
> net/sched/sch_htb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
> index d2922c0..1bd3faa 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_htb.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
> @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ ok:
> q->now = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
> start_at = jiffies;
>
> - next_event = q->now + 5 * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + next_event = q->now + (u32)5 * NSEC_PER_SEC;
>
> for (level = 0; level < TC_HTB_MAXDEPTH; level++) {
> /* common case optimization - skip event handler quickly */
But this patch is wrong !
I am a bit surprised, as I remember spotting this error in one patch
submission from Vimalkumar.
Apparently it got lost.
Please fix the bug for good, not adding another one.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists