linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 24/27] x86: Add swiotlb force off support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2012 21:10:30 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 24/27] x86: Add swiotlb force off support

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:15:56PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> So use could disable swiotlb from command line, even swiotlb support
>>> is compiled in.  Just like we have intel_iommu=on and intel_iommu=off.
>>
>> You really need to spell out why this is useful.
>
> YH why can't we safely autodetect that the swiotlb is unusable when
> there is no memory below 4G free?

good point.

will give it try.

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/