[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1212212055120.24063@pianoman.cluster.toy>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:58:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf tool: Add non arch events for SandyBridge
microarchitecture
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I hate to sound like a broken record here, but, again, what's the
> > rationalization for not using libpfm4 here?
>
> Personally I always hated the libpfm4 syntax. It's even worse than
> oprofile.
how so? The libpfm4 event names are more or less the same as that from
the manuals with the exception that . is replaced with : in some cases.
> I'm probably biased, but it's usually best to use the format the CPU
> vendor releases the original event tables in. That gives you
> the fastest access with the minimum amount of hazzle.
Which vendors provide "original tables"? None as far as I know, you are
stuck digging through PDFs.
Unless you mean the tables that come with Vtune... are those licensed in a
way that is useful?
libpfm4 also provides at least minimal event descriptions along with each
event, will the kernel/perf provide those too?
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists