[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D6050B.8080400@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:07:55 -0200
From: Lucas Kannebley Tavares <lucaskt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, benh@....ibm.com,
Betty Dall <betty.dall@...com>,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm: change pci_read_config_dword calls to pcie_capability_read_dword
ones
Replacing these calls avoids compatibility problems with PCIe v1/v2
Capability structures.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Kannebley Tavares <lucaskt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c | 8 ++------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
index ea41234..b824d4c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pci.c
@@ -486,17 +486,13 @@ int drm_pcie_get_speed_cap_mask(struct drm_device
*dev, u32 *mask)
if (root == NULL)
root = dev->pdev;
- pos = pci_pcie_cap(root);
- if (!pos)
- return -EINVAL;
-
/* we've been informed via and serverworks don't make the cut */
if (root->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA ||
root->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS)
return -EINVAL;
- pci_read_config_dword(root, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &lnkcap);
- pci_read_config_dword(root, pos + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP2, &lnkcap2);
+ pcie_capability_read_dword(root, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &lnkcap);
+ pcie_capability_read_dword(root, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &lnkcap2);
lnkcap &= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
lnkcap2 &= 0xfe;
--
Lucas Kannebley Tavares
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists