[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1356141435-17340-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:57:00 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/25] kprobes: fix wait_for_kprobe_optimizer()
wait_for_kprobe_optimizer() seems largely broken. It uses
optimizer_comp which is never re-initialized, so
wait_for_kprobe_optimizer() will never wait for anything once
kprobe_optimizer() finishes all pending jobs for the first time.
Also, aside from completion, delayed_work_pending() is %false once
kprobe_optimizer() starts execution and wait_for_kprobe_optimizer()
won't wait for it.
Reimplement it so that it flushes optimizing_work until
[un]optimizing_lists are empty. Note that this also makes
optimizing_work execute immediately if someone's waiting for it, which
is the nicer behavior.
Only compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
---
Please let me know how this patch should be routed. I can take it
through the workqueue tree if necessary.
Thanks.
kernel/kprobes.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 098f396..f230e81 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -471,7 +471,6 @@ static LIST_HEAD(unoptimizing_list);
static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work);
static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(optimizing_work, kprobe_optimizer);
-static DECLARE_COMPLETION(optimizer_comp);
#define OPTIMIZE_DELAY 5
/*
@@ -552,8 +551,7 @@ static __kprobes void do_free_cleaned_kprobes(struct list_head *free_list)
/* Start optimizer after OPTIMIZE_DELAY passed */
static __kprobes void kick_kprobe_optimizer(void)
{
- if (!delayed_work_pending(&optimizing_work))
- schedule_delayed_work(&optimizing_work, OPTIMIZE_DELAY);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&optimizing_work, OPTIMIZE_DELAY);
}
/* Kprobe jump optimizer */
@@ -592,16 +590,25 @@ static __kprobes void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
/* Step 5: Kick optimizer again if needed */
if (!list_empty(&optimizing_list) || !list_empty(&unoptimizing_list))
kick_kprobe_optimizer();
- else
- /* Wake up all waiters */
- complete_all(&optimizer_comp);
}
/* Wait for completing optimization and unoptimization */
static __kprobes void wait_for_kprobe_optimizer(void)
{
- if (delayed_work_pending(&optimizing_work))
- wait_for_completion(&optimizer_comp);
+ mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
+
+ while (!list_empty(&optimizing_list) || !list_empty(&unoptimizing_list)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
+
+ /* this will also make optimizing_work execute immmediately */
+ flush_delayed_work(&optimizing_work);
+ /* @optimizing_work might not have been queued yet, relax */
+ cpu_relax();
+
+ mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
}
/* Optimize kprobe if p is ready to be optimized */
--
1.8.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists