[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bodmhkns.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:42:47 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 24/27] x86: Add swiotlb force off support
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:15:56PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> So use could disable swiotlb from command line, even swiotlb support
>> is compiled in. Just like we have intel_iommu=on and intel_iommu=off.
>
> You really need to spell out why this is useful.
YH why can't we safely autodetect that the swiotlb is unusable when
there is no memory below 4G free?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists