lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ec09bb641d19e31e173f0d7f338cdfb.squirrel@webmail.nctu.edu.tw>
Date:	Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:37:02 +0800
From:	cyhung.cs00g@...u.edu.tw
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: The relationship between flag: BH_Uptodate & BH_Dirty in 
 buffer_head

Hi, all

I want ask a question.

As we know, structure buffer_head has a member called b_state.
And this state could be defined by many flags.

The question is that, I want to know the relationship between BH_Uptodate
& BH_Dirty.

If a data is verified, the BH_Dirty will setup, and what about BH_Uptodate?

Under what circumstance the BH_Uptodate would be set up?


Thanks. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ