[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D53639.6040604@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 23:25:29 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Jorn_Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] mm: make mlockall preserve flags other than VM_LOCKED
in def_flags
On 12/20/2012 07:49 PM, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On most architectures, def_flags is either 0 or VM_LOCKED depending on
> whether mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) was called. However, this is not an absolute
> rule as kvm support on s390 may set the VM_NOHUGEPAGE flag in def_flags.
> We don't want mlockall to clear that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists