[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121224161827.GR30837@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:18:27 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/25] wm97xx: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 01:54:50AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> This is not 100% equivalent transformation as now we schedule first and
> disable IRQ later... Anyway, I think the driver shoudl be converted to
> threaded IRQ instead. Mark, does the patch below make any sense to you?
I'm a bit nervous about the fact that currently both the pen down IRQ
and the coordinate read are pushed through a single workqueue so are
serialised but after your patch they'll be split into the IRQ thread and
the workqueue. It *should* be fine but I'd have to sit there and study
it to convince myself that it's safe.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists