[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D8F054.20404@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:16:20 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/27] x86, 64bit: early #PF handler set page table
On 12/20/2012 08:56 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> So in that case, kgdb is broken and will need to be fixed up. That
>> happens all the time with debugging tools.
>
> If there is a way that we can make all parties happy, we really should
> not break KGDB.
>
> Please reconsider to stop #PF handler in x86_64_start_kernel. in that case
> 1. microcode update still can use #PF handler to find microcode in
> ramdisk and use it.
> 2. kernel that is loaded above 4G, could set mapping in C instead of
> set that in head_64.S
> and use ioremap to access zero_page
> 3. KGDB still can call early_trap_init early before init_mem_mapping.
>
Yinghai, this is total and utter bullshit.
We should *fix* kgdb, not pave around it. I refuse to have kgdb be yet
another Xen turning random kernel internals into ABIs.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists