[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121225165803.GA9066@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:58:03 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Cc: Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
criu@...nvz.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] signalfd: add ability to return siginfo in a raw
format
On 12/25, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>
> On 12/25/2012 07:27 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > I guess that probably you actually need DUMP, not DEQUEUE. but the
> > latter is not trivial. However, perhaps we can do this assuming that
> > all other threads are sleeping and nobody can do dequeue_signal().
> > Say, we can play with ppos/llseek. If *ppos is not zero,
> > signalfd_dequeue() could dump the nth entry from list or return 0.
>
> This would be perfect, but isn't it better to preserve the pos
> semantics -- we do know size of entry we're about to copy, we can
> treat pos as offset in bytes, not in elements.
nr-of-records looks better (more flexible) than nr-of-bytes to me. And
perhaps we can also encode private-or-shared into ppos. But I will not
argue in any case.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists