lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121226175004.GA23250@kroah.com> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:50:04 -0800 From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> Cc: "he, bo" <bo.he@...el.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] output the cpu number when printking. On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 09:09:05AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 09:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 01:01:55PM +0800, he, bo wrote: > > > From: "he, bo" <bo.he@...el.com> > > > > > > We often hit kernel panic issues on SMP machines because processes race > > > on multiple cpu. By adding a new parameter printk.cpu, kernel prints > > > cpu number at printk information line. It’s useful to debug what cpus > > > are racing. > > > > How useful is this really for normal developers? > It's very useful to debug race conditions under SMP environment. > We applied the patch to our Android build image on our smartphones. That's fine for your application, and seemed to be useful to others with their first interactions with SMP systems. However, once you start to get to "real" numbers of CPUs, this information turns pretty pointless, which is why the patch was originally rejected. sorry, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists