[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50DA70E0.3050704@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 12:37:04 +0900
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com, liuj97@...il.com,
len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
cl@...ux.com, minchan.kim@...il.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
wujianguo@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com, hpa@...or.com,
linfeng@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
cmetcalf@...era.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/14] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory()
for removing page table depends on architecture
(2012/12/24 21:09), Tang Chen wrote:
> From: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>
> For removing memory, we need to remove page table. But it depends
> on architecture. So the patch introduce arch_remove_memory() for
> removing page table. Now it only calls __remove_pages().
>
> Note: __remove_pages() for some archtecuture is not implemented
> (I don't know how to implement it for s390).
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Then, remove code will be symetric to add codes.
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists