[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd_1VjQAVyGkvLKqy1ceE8rKCz1cRuoWg+RgSEF-M_OFEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:22:08 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: Introduce some information prints in the mount path
2012/12/26, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
> On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 11:10 +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> 2012/12/26, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>:
>> > Hi,
>> Hi Jaegeuk.
>> >
>> > Could you make them follow the file system convention?
>> > Something like "F2FS: blah blah~".
>> Yes, I agree.
>>
>> >
>> > Otherwise, how about adding a debugging function to express the prefix?
>> Okay, I will send you the patches included your suggestion.
>
> Add
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>
> before any #include
Hi Joe.
I think we can have debugging message function for f2fs similar to
ext4/fat like fat_msg, ext4_msg.
It is one time change but in the future it will allow more convenience
to use that way.
What is your opinion ?
Or is that we have to to use pr_xxx function for error print instead
of own print debug function ?
Thanks.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists