linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] memory-hotplug: move pgdat_resize_lock into sparse_remove_one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50DA9739.3070907@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:20:41 +0800
From:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com, liuj97@...il.com,
	len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	cl@...ux.com, minchan.kim@...il.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
	wujianguo@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com, hpa@...or.com,
	linfeng@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de,
	yinghai@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	cmetcalf@...era.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] memory-hotplug: move pgdat_resize_lock into
 sparse_remove_one_section()

On 12/26/2012 11:47 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2012/12/24 21:09), Tang Chen wrote:
>> In __remove_section(), we locked pgdat_resize_lock when calling
>> sparse_remove_one_section(). This lock will disable irq. But we don't need
>> to lock the whole function. If we do some work to free pagetables in
>> free_section_usemap(), we need to call flush_tlb_all(), which need
>> irq enabled. Otherwise the WARN_ON_ONCE() in smp_call_function_many()
>> will be triggered.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan<laijs@...fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang<wency@...fujitsu.com>
> 
> If this is a bug fix, call-trace in your log and BUGFIX or -fix- in patch title
> will be appreciated, I think.
> 
> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> 
Hi Kamezawa-san,

Thanks for the reviewing.

I don't think this would be a bug. It is OK to lock the whole
sparse_remove_one_section() if no tlb flushing in free_section_usemap().

But we need to flush tlb in free_section_usemap(), so we need to take
free_section_usemap() out of the lock. :)

I add the call trace to the patch so that people could review it more
easily.

And here is the call trace for this version:

[  454.796248] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  454.851408] WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:461
smp_call_function_many+0xbd/0x260()
[  454.935620] Hardware name: PRIMEQUEST 1800E
......
[  455.652201] Call Trace:
[  455.681391]  [<ffffffff8106e73f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
[  455.753151]  [<ffffffff810560a0>] ? leave_mm+0x50/0x50
[  455.814527]  [<ffffffff8106e79a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[  455.884208]  [<ffffffff810e7a9d>] smp_call_function_many+0xbd/0x260
[  455.959082]  [<ffffffff810e7ecb>] smp_call_function+0x3b/0x50
[  456.027722]  [<ffffffff810560a0>] ? leave_mm+0x50/0x50
[  456.089098]  [<ffffffff810e7f4b>] on_each_cpu+0x3b/0xc0
[  456.151512]  [<ffffffff81055f0c>] flush_tlb_all+0x1c/0x20
[  456.216004]  [<ffffffff8104f8de>] remove_pagetable+0x14e/0x1d0
[  456.285683]  [<ffffffff8104f978>] vmemmap_free+0x18/0x20
[  456.349139]  [<ffffffff811b8797>] sparse_remove_one_section+0xf7/0x100
[  456.427126]  [<ffffffff811c5fc2>] __remove_section+0xa2/0xb0
[  456.494726]  [<ffffffff811c6070>] __remove_pages+0xa0/0xd0
[  456.560258]  [<ffffffff81669c7b>] arch_remove_memory+0x6b/0xc0
[  456.629937]  [<ffffffff8166ad28>] remove_memory+0xb8/0xf0
[  456.694431]  [<ffffffff813e686f>] acpi_memory_device_remove+0x53/0x96
[  456.771379]  [<ffffffff813b33c4>] acpi_device_remove+0x90/0xb2
[  456.841059]  [<ffffffff8144b02c>] __device_release_driver+0x7c/0xf0
[  456.915928]  [<ffffffff8144b1af>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50
[  456.988719]  [<ffffffff813b4476>] acpi_bus_remove+0x32/0x6d
[  457.055285]  [<ffffffff813b4542>] acpi_bus_trim+0x91/0x102
[  457.120814]  [<ffffffff813b463b>] acpi_bus_hot_remove_device+0x88/0x16b
[  457.199840]  [<ffffffff813afda7>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x27/0x34
[  457.275756]  [<ffffffff81091ece>] process_one_work+0x20e/0x5c0
[  457.345434]  [<ffffffff81091e5f>] ? process_one_work+0x19f/0x5c0
[  457.417190]  [<ffffffff813afd80>] ?
acpi_os_wait_events_complete+0x23/0x23
[  457.499332]  [<ffffffff81093f6e>] worker_thread+0x12e/0x370
[  457.565896]  [<ffffffff81093e40>] ? manage_workers+0x180/0x180
[  457.635574]  [<ffffffff8109a09e>] kthread+0xee/0x100
[  457.694871]  [<ffffffff810dfaf9>] ? __lock_release+0x129/0x190
[  457.764552]  [<ffffffff81099fb0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[  457.839427]  [<ffffffff81690aac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[  457.903914]  [<ffffffff81099fb0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[  457.978784] ---[ end trace 25e85300f542aa01 ]---

Thanks. :)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/