linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] RFC: Intel QST driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+i0qc6K-dXDFbTLaxH7VUMOsGKCpUr_yG-1-1vis+D4wEcJDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:56:26 +0200
From:	Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	"Simon J. Rowe" <srowe@...e.org.uk>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <samuel.ortiz@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] RFC: Intel QST driver

> >
> > 4) I don't believe the MEI (HECI) implementation that Intel have
> > already submitted to the mainline kernel is usable by other kernel
> > modules. I have re-implemented it in a way that is accessible to
> > either the kernel or userspace.
> >
> 2.6.39 does not include the new mei driver, so I don't think you can make
> that claim.
>
 We are working on adding possibility of stacking another drivers
above the MEI
in these days. I cannot commit to specific time line yet but it is on the way.


Thanks
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/