| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1356624306.10284.2.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:05:06 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.57-rt82
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.0.57-rt82 stable release.
You can get this release via the git tree at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git
Head SHA1: 5d64f2c93f9dfa509549d2103ff06d5d84731d2f
Or to build 3.0.57-rt82 directly, the following patches should be applied:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/linux-3.0.tar.xz
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/patch-3.0.57.xz
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.0/patch-3.0.57-rt82.patch.xz
You can also build from 3.0.57-rt81 by applying the incremental patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.0/incr/patch-3.0.57-rt81-rt82.patch.xz
Enjoy,
-- Steve
Changes from 3.0.57-rt81:
---
Steven Rostedt (1):
Linux 3.0.57-rt82
Thomas Gleixner (3):
sched: Adjust sched_reset_on_fork when nothing else changes
sched: Queue RT tasks to head when prio drops
sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler
----
include/linux/sched.h | 5 +++++
kernel/rtmutex.c | 12 +++++++++++
kernel/sched.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
localversion-rt | 2 +-
4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
---------------------------
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index a179dd0..8772834 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2089,6 +2089,7 @@ static inline void sched_autogroup_exit(struct signal_struct *sig) { }
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
extern void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio);
extern int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *p);
+extern int rt_mutex_check_prio(struct task_struct *task, int newprio);
static inline void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
{
task_setprio(p, prio);
@@ -2103,6 +2104,10 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *p)
{
return p->normal_prio;
}
+static inline int rt_mutex_check_prio(struct task_struct *task, int newprio)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
# define rt_mutex_adjust_pi(p) do { } while (0)
static inline bool tsk_is_pi_blocked(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c
index d58db99..7667c5e 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -124,6 +124,18 @@ int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task)
}
/*
+ * Called by sched_setscheduler() to check whether the priority change
+ * is overruled by a possible priority boosting.
+ */
+int rt_mutex_check_prio(struct task_struct *task, int newprio)
+{
+ if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
+ return 0;
+
+ return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->pi_list_entry.prio <= newprio;
+}
+
+/*
* Adjust the priority of a task, after its pi_waiters got modified.
*
* This can be both boosting and unboosting. task->pi_lock must be held.
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 2cf4c4b..858f5df 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4989,7 +4989,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sleep_on_timeout);
* This function changes the 'effective' priority of a task. It does
* not touch ->normal_prio like __setscheduler().
*
- * Used by the rt_mutex code to implement priority inheritance logic.
+ * Used by the rt_mutex code to implement priority inheritance
+ * logic. Call site only calls if the priority of the task changed.
*/
void task_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
{
@@ -5206,20 +5207,25 @@ static struct task_struct *find_process_by_pid(pid_t pid)
return pid ? find_task_by_vpid(pid) : current;
}
-/* Actually do priority change: must hold rq lock. */
-static void
-__setscheduler(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int policy, int prio)
+static void __setscheduler_params(struct task_struct *p, int policy, int prio)
{
p->policy = policy;
p->rt_priority = prio;
p->normal_prio = normal_prio(p);
+ set_load_weight(p);
+}
+
+/* Actually do priority change: must hold rq lock. */
+static void
+__setscheduler(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int policy, int prio)
+{
+ __setscheduler_params(p, policy, prio);
/* we are holding p->pi_lock already */
p->prio = rt_mutex_getprio(p);
if (rt_prio(p->prio))
p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class;
else
p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
- set_load_weight(p);
}
/*
@@ -5244,6 +5250,7 @@ static bool check_same_owner(struct task_struct *p)
static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
const struct sched_param *param, bool user)
{
+ int newprio = MAX_RT_PRIO - 1 - param->sched_priority;
int retval, oldprio, oldpolicy = -1, on_rq, running;
unsigned long flags;
const struct sched_class *prev_class;
@@ -5339,11 +5346,13 @@ recheck:
}
/*
- * If not changing anything there's no need to proceed further:
+ * If not changing anything there's no need to proceed
+ * further, but store a possible modification of
+ * reset_on_fork.
*/
if (unlikely(policy == p->policy && (!rt_policy(policy) ||
param->sched_priority == p->rt_priority))) {
-
+ p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
__task_rq_unlock(rq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
return 0;
@@ -5370,6 +5379,25 @@ recheck:
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
goto recheck;
}
+
+ p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
+ oldprio = p->prio;
+
+ /*
+ * Special case for priority boosted tasks.
+ *
+ * If the new priority is lower or equal (user space view)
+ * than the current (boosted) priority, we just store the new
+ * normal parameters and do not touch the scheduler class and
+ * the runqueue. This will be done when the task deboost
+ * itself.
+ */
+ if (rt_mutex_check_prio(p, newprio)) {
+ __setscheduler_params(p, policy, param->sched_priority);
+ task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
on_rq = p->on_rq;
running = task_current(rq, p);
if (on_rq)
@@ -5377,16 +5405,18 @@ recheck:
if (running)
p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p);
- p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
-
- oldprio = p->prio;
prev_class = p->sched_class;
__setscheduler(rq, p, policy, param->sched_priority);
if (running)
p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
- if (on_rq)
- activate_task(rq, p, 0);
+ if (on_rq) {
+ /*
+ * We enqueue to tail when the priority of a task is
+ * increased (user space view).
+ */
+ activate_task(rq, p, oldprio <= p->prio ? ENQUEUE_HEAD : 0);
+ }
check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio);
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
diff --git a/localversion-rt b/localversion-rt
index 8269ec1..5655698 100644
--- a/localversion-rt
+++ b/localversion-rt
@@ -1 +1 @@
--rt81
+-rt82
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists