[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50DBD896.8040706@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:41:50 +0530
From: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
To: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6 v9] arm: use devicetree to get smp_twd clock
On Friday 07 December 2012 04:12 AM, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com>
> ---
> Changes from v4, v5, v6, v7, v8
> None.
> Changes from v3
> No longer setting *clk to NULL in twd_get_clock().
> Changes from v2
> Turned the check for the node pointer into an if-then-else statement.
> Removed the second, redundant clk_get_rate.
> Changes from v1
> None.
>
> arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Hi Mark,
What is the status of this patch?
Regards,
PrashantG
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> index b22d700..af46b80 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> @@ -237,12 +237,15 @@ static irqreturn_t twd_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_NONE;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists