[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121228190331.341180069@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:03:36 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@...el.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...ris-wilson.co.uk>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
Sean Finney <seanius@...nius.net>,
Soren Hansen <soren@...ux2go.dk>,
Hernando Torque <sirius@...nenkinder.org>,
Mike Lothian <mike@...eburn.co.uk>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Subject: [ 006/173] drm: give up on edid retries when i2c bus is not responding
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@...el.com>
commit 9292f37e1f5c79400254dca46f83313488093825 upstream.
This allows to avoid talking to a non-responding bus repeatedly until we
finally timeout after 15 attempts. We can do this by catching the -ENXIO
error, provided by i2c_algo_bit:bit_doAddress call.
Within the bit_doAddress we already try 3 times to get the edid data, so
if the routine tells us that bus is not responding, it is mostly pointless
to keep re-trying those attempts over and over again until we reach final
number of retries.
This change should fix https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41059
and improve overall edid detection timing by 10-30% in most cases, and by
a much larger margin in case of phantom outputs (up to 30x in one worst
case).
Timing results for i915-powered machines for 'time xrandr' command:
Machine 1: from 0.840s to 0.290s
Machine 2: from 0.315s to 0.280s
Machine 3: from +/- 4s to 0.184s
Timing results for HD5770 with 'time xrandr' command:
Machine 4: from 3.210s to 1.060s
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...ris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Tested-by: Sean Finney <seanius@...nius.net>
Tested-by: Soren Hansen <soren@...ux2go.dk>
Tested-by: Hernando Torque <sirius@...nenkinder.org>
Tested-by: Mike Lothian <mike@...eburn.co.uk>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41059
Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index ece03fc..54a4efa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -266,6 +266,11 @@ drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned char *buf,
}
};
ret = i2c_transfer(adapter, msgs, 2);
+ if (ret == -ENXIO) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("drm: skipping non-existent adapter %s\n",
+ adapter->name);
+ break;
+ }
} while (ret != 2 && --retries);
return ret == 2 ? 0 : -1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists