[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1356731537.21409.1002.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:52:17 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lib: cpu_rmap: avoid flushing all workqueues
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 13:44 -0800, David Decotigny wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> Ok for the cpu_rmap_put helper. Will do this in v3 of this patch.
>
> Your comments suggest more refactoring, which might be better in the
> form of 1 or 2 additional patches that:
> - rename alloc_cpu_rmap & co according to new conventions (cpu_rmap_*)
> - remove the cpu_rmap sub-API altogether, keeping only irq_cpu_rmap
> (controversial?)
>
> I'd rather current patch is integrated in its own as it fixes an actual bug.
> I will send the other patch(es) separately later.
This looks fine to me !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists