[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50DCE6D5.7000901@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:24:53 +0900
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>, sanjay@...gle.com,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Robert Love <rlove@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Mike Hommey <mh@...ndium.org>, Taras Glek <tglek@...illa.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 0/3] Support volatile for anonymous range
(2012/12/26 12:46), Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Kame,
>
> What are you doing these holiday season? :)
> I can't believe you sit down in front of computer.
>
Honestly, my holiday starts tomorrow ;) (but until 1/5 in the next year.)
>>
>> Hm, by the way, the user need to attach pages to the process by causing page-fault
>> (as you do by memset()) before calling mvolatile() ?
>
> For effectiveness, Yes.
>
Isn't it better to make page-fault by get_user_pages() in mvolatile() ?
Calling page fault in userland seems just to increase burden of apps.
>>
>> I think your approach is interesting, anyway.
>
> Thanks for your interest, Kame.
>
> あけましておめでとう.
>
A happy new year.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists