lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:02:28 +0800
From:	Wen Congyang <>
To:	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <>
CC:	Tang Chen <>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/14] memory-hotplug: free node_data when a node is

At 12/28/2012 08:28 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki Wrote:
> (2012/12/27 21:16), Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 12/26/2012 11:55 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki Wrote:
>>> (2012/12/24 21:09), Tang Chen wrote:
>>>> From: Wen Congyang <>
>>>> We call hotadd_new_pgdat() to allocate memory to store node_data. So we
>>>> should free it when removing a node.
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <>
>>> I'm sorry but is it safe to remove pgdat ? All zone cache and zonelists are
>>> properly cleared/rebuilded in synchronous way ? and No threads are visinting
>>> zone in vmscan.c ?
>> We have rebuilt zonelists when a zone has no memory after offlining some pages.
> How do you guarantee that the address of pgdat/zone is not on stack of any kernel
> threads or other kernel objects without reference counting or other syncing method ?

No way to guarentee this. But, the kernel should not use the address of pgdat/zone when
it is offlined.

Hmm, what about this: reuse the memory when the node is onlined again?

Wen Congyang

> Thanks,
> -Kame

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists