[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6-1L54a1MB_7ERmTsXX=LY+ShfZ-fxoDsEwR8q2uj-EW_-nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:45:31 +0100
From: Sylvain Munaut <s.munaut@...tever-company.com>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Fix incorrect length from print_time() when
seconds > 99999
Hi,
>> Sylvan Munaut did something similar
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/5/168
>
> Missed that and duplicated the debugging :(
> Sorry Sylvain.
I should have followed up on the patch sooner, but I basically
finished testing it fixed all the issues and posted it just before
leaving for vacation and I just got back (and didn't check my work
email there).
> I guess my patch may be preferable, since I happened to use the snprintf()
> method that you suggest -- all the open-coded digit-counting seems a bit
> verbose and perhaps hard to read and see the equivalence to the sprintf.
Yes, I just did it that way to match the way if was done in other
parts of that file in ... the snprintf method is clearly more
readable.
Cheers,
Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists