lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121231175229.GA32115@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:52:29 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
	Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
	Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] uprobes: Do not allocate current->utask unnecessary

handle_swbp() does get_utask() before can_skip_sstep() for no reason,
we do not need ->utask if can_skip_sstep() succeeds.

Move get_utask() to pre_ssout() who actually starts to use it. Move
the initialization of utask->active_uprobe/state as well. This way
the whole initialization is consolidated in pre_ssout().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |   16 ++++++----------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index bd94d2c..ad1245d 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1308,7 +1308,9 @@ pre_ssout(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long bp_vaddr)
 	unsigned long xol_vaddr;
 	int err;
 
-	utask = current->utask;
+	utask = get_utask();
+	if (!utask)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	xol_vaddr = xol_get_insn_slot(uprobe);
 	if (!xol_vaddr)
@@ -1323,6 +1325,8 @@ pre_ssout(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long bp_vaddr)
 		return err;
 	}
 
+	utask->active_uprobe = uprobe;
+	utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1474,7 +1478,6 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
  */
 static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	struct uprobe_task *utask;
 	struct uprobe *uprobe;
 	unsigned long bp_vaddr;
 	int uninitialized_var(is_swbp);
@@ -1512,19 +1515,12 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (unlikely(!test_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags)))
 		goto out;
 
-	utask = get_utask();
-	if (!utask)
-		goto out;	/* re-execute the instruction. */
-
 	handler_chain(uprobe, regs);
 	if (can_skip_sstep(uprobe, regs))
 		goto out;
 
-	if (!pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr)) {
-		utask->active_uprobe = uprobe;
-		utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
+	if (!pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr))
 		return;
-	}
 
 	/* can_skip_sstep() succeeded, or restart if can't singlestep */
 out:
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ