[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <y0mliceujz4.fsf@fche.csb>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:58:39 -0500
From: fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ktap: Another dynamic tracing tool for Linux
bookjovi wrote:
> [...] This mail is RFC for discuss on a new dynamic tracing tool, I
> name it ktap. (only experimental project now)
Welcome to the problem domain!
> [...]
> what ktap differentiates with Systemtap is:
> [...]
> 2). ktap have good portability, because it compile source file to
> bytecode, like python and Java.
(From this PoV, systemtap is just as portable as the kernel, as it
generates the same sort of C code the kernel is built from.)
> [...]
> 5). ktap will be open source completely, with GPL license, it might be
> merge into mainline in someday, that's very convince for tracing user.
(systemtap has always been GPLv2, ever since its beginning in 2005.)
> [...]
> ktap use lua language syntax and bytecode as initial implementation,
Interesting approach. I recall we considered it way back when, but
rejected it for a couple of reasons, including the at-the-time
perceived unwelcomeness of a serious bytecode interpreter within the
kernel.
> it could support kprobe, uprobe, userspace probe, etc.
Great.
> I wish you can give me some technical architecture pre-review for
> ktap, before ktap release 1.0.
> Any comments is welcome, thanks very much.
Have you made any source code available yet?
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists