linux-kernel - Re: Revisiting EFI boot stub config file support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <710F73BE-9F65-48C9-8739-BFCF097F4B07@shealevy.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:26:29 -0500
From:	Shea Levy <shea@...alevy.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Revisiting EFI boot stub config file support

On Jan 1, 2013, at 12:24, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:

> On 01/01/2013 07:55 AM, Shea Levy wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> In March last year, I submitted a patch to enable the EFI boot stub to
>> read its config arguments from a file on the ESP, both to help with
>> booting from livecds and to avoid having to use efibootmgr every time
>> you change your boottime arguments. I ended up dropping the submission
>> because I ended up coming to the conclusion that tools like rEFInd and
>> gummiboot were better suited to the task of boot managing than the
>> kernel itself.
>> 
>> Since then, however, I've received enough emails asking about the status
>> of the patch that I think there is room for a simpler entrant into the
>> field of linux EFI boot management. This could be in-kernel, as per my
>> original patch, or a very simple out-of-kernel (but maybe distributed
>> in-tree?) efi image that simply reads linux.conf and boots linux with
>> those parameters. My personal bias is still toward handling this
>> functionality outside of the kernel itself, but before I started the
>> work I thought I'd ask here if anyone thought I should instead bring my
>> old patch up-to-date.
> 
> I am willing to accept this (but I am not the first-line maintainer,
> Matt is) in the kernel EFI stub as long as there are no hard-coded
> filenames involved, no automatic behavior, and no "scanning".  Those are
> showstoppers, as is adding to the boot time for nonusers.

Hm, ok. Does the boot stub have access to CONFIG_CMDLINE? Or could another compile-time setting be added so that distros can ship livecds that automatically use a config file found at a hard-coded location?

> 
>    -hpa
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/