[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000013bfbe28263-98bca726-cf8f-4307-989d-472ea478e7f3-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:30:24 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/27] nohz: Assign timekeeping duty to a non-full-nohz
CPU
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> @@ -163,6 +164,8 @@ static int __init tick_nohz_full_setup(char *str)
> return 1;
> }
> __setup("full_nohz=", tick_nohz_full_setup);
> +#else
> +#define have_full_nohz_mask (0)
> #endif
>
> /*
> @@ -512,6 +515,10 @@ static bool can_stop_idle_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
> return false;
> }
>
> + /* If there are full nohz CPUs around, we need to keep the timekeeping duty */
> + if (have_full_nohz_mask && tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu)
> + return false;
> +
> return true;
> }
>
>
Ok so I guess this means that if I setup all cpus as nohz then a random
one will continue to do timekeeping?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists