[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130102160239.GI22160@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:02:39 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, paul@...lmenage.org,
glommer@...allels.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
bsingharora@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cpuset: decouple cpuset locking from
cgroup core
On Wed 02-01-13 10:36:05, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey, Michal.
>
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:53:55AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hi Li,
> >
> > On Wed 26-12-12 18:51:02, Li Zefan wrote:
> > > I reverted 38d7bee9d24adf4c95676a3dc902827c72930ebb ("cpuset: use N_MEMORY instead N_HIGH_MEMORY")
> > > and applied this patchset against 3.8-rc1.
> >
> > I didn't find any patch in this email.
> > Anyway I am wondering how the above patch could cause the stuck you
> > mention below? The patch just renames N_HIGH_MEMORY -> N_MEMORY which
> > should map to the very same constant so there are no functional changes
> > AFAIU.
>
> Li needed to revert the said patch only to apply the patchset on top
> of 3.8-rc1. The N_MEMORY patch doesn't have anything to do with the
> problem Li is seeing.
Ohh, ok
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists