[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130102163010.GB14219@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:30:10 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Chris Mason <clmason@...ionio.com>
Subject: Re: memory corruption, possibly caused by i915
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:01:15AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > [52460.280346] BUG: Bad page map in process panel-6-systray pte:ffff8800b665a0e8 pmd:b6659067
> > [52460.280848] addr:00000038bf3fd000 vm_flags:00000070 anon_vma: (null) mapping:ffff88011052fd98 index:1fd
> > [52460.281547] vma->vm_ops->fault: filemap_fault+0x0/0x470
> > [52460.281878] vma->vm_file->f_op->mmap: btrfs_file_mmap+0x0/0x60 [btrfs]
> >
> > It's falling over in btrfs's mmap op, but I think it's just the victim here,
> > of something else corrupting what had been mmaped in the panel process.
>
> It's a btrfs file, but this isn't in our mmap op. The traces are
> finding bad pages at unmap time.
Sorry, bad wording on my part.
> > Daniel, can you think of additional sanity checks that could be added to
> > the i915 driver ? (Even if at the expense of speed: a CONFIG_DEBUG option
> > to prove correctness would be very worthwhile imo)
>
> If the bad pages are getting all the way to btrfs,
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_ALOC may help? You've got lockdep on so maybe you
> already enabled it.
Yeah, already enabled.
Thanks.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists